Is Quantum Baron legit?

Unknown. EALegit has not audited Quantum Baron. A listing is not a verdict that it is legit.

Has EALegit independently reviewed Quantum Baron?

Not yet. Listing is seller materials. The owner can submit source from For developers.

Does Quantum Baron use grid or martingale?

Seller materials mention grid. Not audited — we have not confirmed the code.

Can I trust the seller backtest?

No usable seller baseline is published and we have no lab replay. Treat the seller backtest as untested marketing.

Risk-flagged seller

Seller warning

EALegit review: this seller's published results hide losing days (hard-coded stop dates found in Quantum Queen X source).

Source: EALegit review

Seller price $1199.99

Curve replay

Backtest vs lab reality

Zero corroboration

Seller marketing curve (claimed)Lab replay not run

Execution engine locked

Real-tick replay has not run for this listing.

Claimed profit factor

— (marketing)

Real-tick PF

Pending

Seller price: $1199.99

Submit source if you own this EA View on MQL5 ↗

Quantum Baron2.92

Developed byBogdan Ion Puscasu10 EAs on record · MQL5 rating 4.7

View on MQL5 ↗

Risk flaggedGridTrend followingXTIUSDM30MetaTrader 5

Seller claims

grid yes · martingale no · SL no

EALegit summary — unaudited listing

Quantum Baron is a MetaTrader expert advisor for XTIUSD (Crude Oil) on the M30 timeframe. It opens only BUY orders and combines trend detection with a grid-based position management approach, per the seller's description. The seller recommends a minimum deposit of $5,000 (ideally $10,000+), low-spread ECN-type accounts, 1:500 leverage, hedge accounts, and mandatory VPS use; no stop loss is mentioned. The seller also markets it as exclusive, with a price that increases after every 10 purchases.

Lab results

Canonical test windows — a slot shows a report only after the run finishes and passes checks.
2024.01.01 → 2026.09.01	failed — see provenance
2024.01.01 → 2025.01.01	failed — see provenance
2025.03.01 → 2025.07.01	failed — see provenance
2026.01.01 → 2026.07.01	failed — see provenance

Seller evidence vs lab result

No usable seller backtest on file. The seller listing does not publish a testable baseline (dates, settings and metrics together), so reproduction is blocked — not failed. Lab results above stand on their own.

Seller evidence is transcribed from dated sources and reviewed before publication. It never changes the performance score or the audit verdict.